MOVING SPOKEN-LIKE WRITING TO MORE ABSTRACT, WRITING

In this teaching thought, I will be discussing elements that formalize student’s non-fictional writing (approximately late primary, and definitely secondary), For example, their more impersonal writing of scientific explanations, their expositions - argument/persuasive, their historical essays, their informational reports.It is necessary to begin by comparing spoken-like writing with more formal writing,

Spoken-like writing
The writing that young students are engaged in is more often than not based on actual experiences with the language being familiar because it is mostly every-day vocabulary that is used, personal pronouns, sensing and action verbs. The active voice is obvious (somebody/something doing something e.g. Lions chase their prey).

 Formal, knowledgeable writing
As writers progress into later primary and secondary schooling their writing leans towards generalized, more abstract ideas, making increasingly complicated connections between ideas. They use precise terminology when explaining abstract ideas. Writing an historical composition, writers objectively recount events and they continually evaluate the causes and effects in an unemotional manner (see examples in Themes (last two paragraphs).

The language in formal writing is not the everyday parlance; more indirect expressions are emphasized. This oblique type of writing is accomplished by the use of nominalisation (noun groups), pronouns are removed from the Theme position, instead noun groups and adverbs/adverbial phrases are placed at the beginning of clauses, passive voice using auxiliary (relating) verbs are apparent e.g. The colony was plagued..., specialized and more sophisticated vocabulary is used, Although these language aspects are segregated in the below discussion, each is part of the other; they work as a whole.


NOMINALISATION
Note of interest: From Wikipedia - In systemic functional grammar (SFG), a nominal group is a group of words which expresses an entity. A "nominal group" is widely regarded as synonymous to noun phrase in other grammatical models,[1][2] although [Michael] Halliday [author of texts about functional grammar] and some of his followers draw a theoretical distinction between the terms group and phrase. He argues that 'A phrase is different from a group in that, whereas a group is an expansion of a word, a phrase is a contraction of a clause'.[3] Halliday borrowed the term 'group' from the linguist/classicist Sydney Allen. [4]

I am of the opinion that either’ group’ or ‘phrase’ can be used providing consistency is the order of the day. I will be using the term‘group’ in this article.


 Nouns are formed as a result of nominalization of verbs, for example, the replacing of a verb (‘settled’) with a noun/noun group (a single topic or event) (’the settlement’). Noun forms of verbs become a concept (an abstract thing) rather than an action. The intention of nominalization is to make writing, especially the writing of non-fiction texts, more impersonal, factual and valid. Extended clause/clauses are repackaged into a noun group condensing ideas which makes the writing more precise. ‘The people who first came to Australia...’ is made more succinct, ‘’Early settlers...’ ‘ These settlers had a bad influence ... ’ becomes ‘Irresponsible settlers ...‘ ‘It was wonderful that people inhabited...’ becomes the noun group The colony was inhabited....’

 The noun group can include  adjectives that are factual ...classify, ‘The first colony...’ describe,  Arduous toil was experienced..., moving the language to a more sophisticated, generalized  level e.g. ‘The immigrant group,..’

 Referring to statements made by specialist writers would be expressed as a noun group, ‘The comment by the forthright professor...’

 I remember teaching children that changing verb endings ‘ed’ (e.g. combined) would change the word into a noun when  ‘tion’ is added (combination). Little did I realize at the time that it was called nominalization and how nominalization functioned in writing. 


THEME
The Theme is the focus of the writing. Students decide what the focus is - what is the Theme to be discussed ?  The Theme is announced at the beginning of a clause. Especially, noun groups as paragraph openers guide the information that follows on,

 Not only are noun groups (e.g. ‘The logging of rain forests’) written at the beginning of clauses but also adverbial phrases time, place (when and where action happened), in what manner etc. can be placed in the Theme position. Adverbs /adverbial phrases introduce cause and effect  When colonists arrived...’ and adverbs Furthermore’. Prepositional phrases (In addition) are also placed in the theme position. The emphasis of noun groups, adverbials and prepositions placed in the Theme position achieves cohesiveness, relationships between concepts and ideas, cause and effect, examples, definitions, descriptions, supporting evidence tend to naturally flow on, For example,

 Colonisation of Australia (noun group) began in 1788. Rather (adverb) than relying on slavery (prepositional phrase), convict labour (noun group) was exploited (auxiliary verb) by England (prepositional phrase) as (conjunction) a cheap and economically viable alternative (noun phrase).

 Alternatives to the personal ‘My opinion is ...’, the Themes of critical writing are made more impersonal:

 The crux (noun phrase) of the argument (noun phrase) is...  OR
The assumption... A disagreement arose... An alternative may be...Opinions may lean towards... and expressing reasons, As a result of...


PASSIVE VOICE – VERBS, AUXILLARY (functional grammar term ‘RELATING’ verbs)
The active nominative is the person or thing doing the action, whereas passive is the person/thing receiving the action.

The emphasis being on what was the effect  not who is responsible.

 “Improvised instruments were played...’ (passive voice). ‘ Many convicts were sentenced ...’ (passive voice, the effect)

 rather than ‘the colonial children played with sticks and stones.’ (active voice, subjects doing the action) 

 Instead of writing action verbs (‘They disagreed...’), the passive voice structure depersonalizes writing.

 Auxiliary (relating) verbs (e.g. ‘was’, ‘is’, ‘are’, ‘were’) help form tenses of other verbs  ‘were played’, ‘were sentenced’. They follow the noun group; they do not express exactly an action.


SPECIALIZED VOCABULARY
None of the above language structures can be achieved without an extensive vocabulary. Technical, specialized  nouns/noun groups and other more sophisticated vocabulary relating specifically to the topic is more applicable to the writing, e.g. ‘established’ would be written instead of ‘found’.

 Each student has easy access to the thesaurus, either hand-held or on-line. Vocabulary is introduced and tightly defined within the particular discipline (e.g. history or science).They must know the particular subject matter (field) extremely well. When a certain writing genre is required, the text structure is known. A wide knowledge of language structures, for example, modals, instead of ‘might’ write ‘probability’, instead of ‘sometimes’ write ‘occasionally’. Using a different word that relates to the topic ‘colony’, , , ‘colonialism’, ‘colonist’, ‘settlers’ (all nouns), ‘colonial’ (adjective) ‘colonize’ (verb) would have a place in writing about early Australia. Terminology like this creates a cohesive tie and keeps writing interesting.

 More precise, descriptive verbs ‘travelled’ replace ‘went’, ‘arrived’ replaces ‘came’, ‘transported’ replaces ‘moved’.



TEACHING PRACTICES
I know it is not easy moving students from speech-like writing to formal, abstract writing. Teachers have to be well-versed in this type of language structure.  Finding good published texts that show noun groups, theme positioning and passive voice are easy to find. I quickly googled ‘colony, Australia’ and this piece had all the elements for modelling mainly noun groups. (Note: I have not highlighted all the language aspects I need the help of students!)

 History of Australia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia
   Main article: Timeline of Australian history                                                                                         

The History of Australia (noun group, beginning of clause) refers (verb) to the history (preposition/noun group = prepositional phrase) of the area and people of Commonwealth of Australia and its preceding Indigenous and colonial societies. Aboriginal Australians (noun group, beginning of clause) are believed (auxiliary verb) to have first arrived on the Australian mainland by boat from the Indonesian archipelago between 40,000 to 60,000 years ago.

The first uncontested landing (noun group, beginning of clause) in Australia by Europeans was by the Dutch navigator Willem Janzoon (prepositions/noun groups = prepositional phrases) in 1606 (preposition/noun= prepositional phrase). European explorers (noun phrase, beginning of clause) followed intermittently until, in 1770 James Cook charted the East coast of Australia...

 Gold rushes and agricultural industries (noun group, beginning of clause) brought prosperity...

 Students do not make the change in one or two experiences in the classroom. Before students independently write an abstract report, say, the teacher provides lots of varied concrete experiences.

There is no doubt that focussed discussions are a key to children learning about the relationships of language and writing. Deconstruction of good published models and Joint construction of texts allow students to verbalize their knowledge, ask questions to clarify their thinking and generally discuss how it all fits into their writing. During these encounters emphasis is directed to the beginning of  clauses, the theme; they see how verbs are changed into noun/noun groups, the difference between the active voice and the passive voice. Their knowledge about adverbs/adverbial phrases and prepositional phrases grow. Practise (pre-skilling) occurs  when students are involved in concrete activities. They reorder cut up sentences and clauses. They may be shown images to discuss and develop formal sentences with partners.

 As their field knowledge grows during visits to museums, viewing artefacts, reading and technology access they record key ideas and their relationships (connect ideas) when drawing and labelling concept maps. These maps (plans) will have nouns and noun groups, adverbial phrases as the key ideas. As students write and re-draft they ask themselves questions, “What is the topic/main idea /focus that I am writing about?” “Have I turned the verb into a noun group – a thing rather than an action?” “Have I placed the main ideas at the beginning of the clauses?” “ Have I used cohesive devices such as nominalisation, adverbs and preposition phrases to move the information along?”

 Knowing meanings of vocabulary relating to the topic and writing more sophisticated verbs continually grow. Class glossaries are displayed or new and specialized vocabulary is recorded in journals.

ONLY UNTIL A LONG TERM STUDY ABOUT NOMINALIZATION, PASSIVE VOICE AND FIELD/NEW VOCABULARY HAS BEEN DONE ARE CHILDREN READY TO WRITE SCHOLARLY COMPOSITIONS. REMEMBERING SOME CHILDREN LEARN QUICKLY, OTHERS ARE SLOWER TO LEARN THIS TYPE OF ABSTRACT WRITING. APPROPRIATE CHALLENGE AND SUPPORT IS ALWAYS THERE FOR EVERY STUDENT, NO MATTER WHAT STAGE THEY ARE AT.

CONTINUING WITH COMMAS



This Blog is building on the information from entry BLOG August, 2014.

How important are commas? In today’s age of texting a lot of punctuation is forgotten and no wonder! Fancy having punctuation on a separate keyboard that the writer has to purposely go to, to insert punctuation? In the old days as a writer wrote by hand, he or she could automatically insert punctuation as he/she was writing. 

You might say that sense is being made by not using commas on mobile ‘phones so why use commas when writing reports, letters, assignments etc?

  • Commas used to make meaning clear
 Commas are used to separate words and phrases and a person who is reading a formal piece of writing will tell you that without the insertion of commas, the reader may have momentary wonderings and ask themselves, “Is that incorrectly expressed?” Well it may be the case that it just needs a comma so the reader does not have to reread the sentence to understand the meaning ... this often happens when I am marking student essays at Flinders University.

      Commas give clarity to the meaning so readers do not have to read the sentence/ phrase a second ... or third time:

Could be interpreted as...
But the writer really meant...


...how best teachers learn - best teachers learn this way  OR


Emphasis on students’ well-being needs to be thoroughly examined –well being needs OR

I’d hand you over to the nearest copper I could see that’d be the proper thing to do - hand you over to the nearest copper I could see... OR

Grimy kids play all week long tall grass they trample about in   long tall grass OR

It would have to be done quickly for once Sam advised the others everyone would know done quickly for once OR

The suppliers need notice before deliveries are arranged  suppliers need to take notice OR

At Vitapet we believe chicken dog treats are essential both chicken and dog treats OR
...how best,  teachers learn – this is the best way for teachers to learn (some advice)

Emphasis on students’ well-being,  needs to be thoroughly examined - well-being ...needs to be examined

I’d hand you over to the nearest copper,  I could see that’d be the proper thing to do -  I could see that’d be the proper thing to do

Grimy kids play all week long, tall grass they trample about in  grimy kids play all week long

It would have to be done quickly, for once Sam advised the others everyone would know for once Sam advised, everyone would know

The suppliers need notice, before deliveries are made   suppliers are given notice

At Vitapet we believe chicken, dog treats are essential  chicken treats for the dog

how best, teachers learn - the most effective way teachers learn.

Emphasis on students’ well-being, needs, to be thoroughly examined’ - students’ well-being, needs to be thoroughly examined’  


  •  The puzzle of whether a comma is written before ‘and’.
To refresh your memories of what was written August 2014, ‘sentences are made up of clauses. A main clause expresses a complete thought; it makes sense written on its own. A subordinate clause, as its name suggests, is subordinate to the main clause in a sentence. If a subordinate clause is removed from the sentence, the sentence would still make perfect sense; the subordinate clause simply provides additional information, description.’

My automatic reaction is not to place a comma before ‘and’ at all. When I saw it written, say in American Education journals, I thought it was an American invention. Having read Mary Norris’s Between you and me I find instead that the insertion of the comma before ‘and’ is referred to as the Oxford comma, Oxford University Press ‘whose house style is to use the serial comma’ before ‘and’.  Later Mary Norris states, ‘The British ...have it both ways: they deride us Americans for our allegiance to the comma [before ‘and’] that they named and then rejected as pretentious.’

I still maintain that there is no comma before ‘and’; ‘and’ as a conjunction links clauses (main and subordinate), so the added pause (comma) between clauses is not necessary.

For example, 

In the game of tennis a player serves and he immediately runs to the net.

But as I am, at this time, reading a book by the admired Welsh author, Ken Follett (which, incidentally, is not published by Oxford University Press), I have found that he inserts a comma before ‘and’ to connect two main clauses, for example,  The French had been horrified, and Fitz had felt deeply ashamed. Another example, ‘They had been schoolboys at Eton together, and Remarc was one of Maud’s gossipy friends.’ However, Ken Follett does not insert a comma before ‘and’  when a main clause is followed by a subordinate clause, Cafes closed at eight and restaurants at nine-thirty. This is ‘food for thought’.


  •  Commas are written between adjectives, if...
Commas are written between adjectives from the same category (coordinate adjectives) but commas are not written between adjectives from different categories e.g. yellow striped.

The girl wore a green, red and yellow striped shirt. Note: You do not use a comma between the final adjective and the noun it modifies. As ‘striped’ is paired with the noun, there is no comma between yellow and striped.

She is a kind, generous, loving human being.                 Same applies as above